Art
is about attracting attention, yes or no? Art is usually created by mankind to express emotions
and deliver messages.
Last
week, I was discussing with my 3D lecturer about some disturbing and
provocative arts. Most of his class works require neat and clean finishing. I
questioned if he could accept something messy, dirty and disturbing, as art is
really subjective. You can create something in your own way and call it as art.
His
answer was fair. You have to know the rules before you break the rules. There
is always a set of rationales to follow in creating arts. At the basic level, he probably prefers something simple, neat, and aesthetic. He mentioned about one of
the stage performance by a student who was caught by the police after performing.
There was a disturbing scene using glass to knock the head to bleed. This kind
of performance requires license to perform by the authority.
The level of acceptance by the public towards the extent of art is still under question. Though the freedom of creating arts does exist.
Without Hope by Frida Kahlo (1945)
|
Anatomical Pieces by Theodore Gericault
|
Photography by Jerome Ambramovitch
|
'Pension Fritzl Vienna' by Viennese theatre group
|
Performance by bio-artist, Stelar
|
Photography by Antony Crossfield
|
Photography by Antony Crossfield
|
'What you see might not be real' by Chen Wenling
|
Doll Art by Bohyun Yoon |
No comments:
Post a Comment